Cases 1 - 10 of 19
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Victor D. Nash
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Beasley, Willesha Warren, Michael Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKISSIC v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ANTIJUAN HILL
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, LYNN GIBSON, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
TREVIS WORTHEN
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. BEASLEY
as 7:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HUNTER
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. MORRISON et al
as 7:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADRIEL NOEL MANN, SR
Defendant:
TANGIE MORRISON, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, OFFICER GILLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS ALONZO SIMS
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, LT KERN and SGT CARGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
