RUFUS v. GEORGIA et al
| MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS |
| STATE OF GEORGIA and BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF |
| 5:2023cv00088 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned- #4 Order to Amend/Recast/Supplement Complaint, sent to MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS returned as undeliverable. (elp) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 04/18/2023. (elp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Recast Complaint: Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 03/23/2023. (elp)
|
| Filing fee Paid: Habeas $5.00, RECEIPT# 500001978 (sst) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tlf)
|
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT to #1 Complaint. Motion to Disqualify Judge filed by MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Clerk to Petitioner, #2 Request for Transcripts, #3 Request for Case Status). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tlf) Modified on 3/21/2023 to change to exhibit (tlf). |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,filed by MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS. (Attachments: #1 Additional Grounds, #2 Amendments to Earlier Challenges, #3 State Court Writ, #4 Memorandum in Support, #5 Envelope)(tlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
