Haugabrook v. Cason et al
| Artrice D. Haugabrook |
| William O Cason, Valdosta City Schools, Valdosta City School Board, Annie Fisher, Vanessa Flucas, Warren Lee, Dean Rexroth, Trey Sherwood, Bill Love, Jeana Beeland, Debra Bell and Kelly Wilson |
| 7:2010cv00060 |
| July 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Lowndes |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 89 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on September 5, 2012. (mbh)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Summary Judgment. Dispositive motions on Plaintiff's discriminatory demotion and section 1988 fees claim related to the demotion claim are to be filed no later than May 7, 2012. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on March 22, 2012. (mbh)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Lift the Stay. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/15/2011. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 50 Motion to Stay not later than 4/14/2011. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/28/2011. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion to Dismiss; denying 25 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on November 22, 2010. (mbh)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 1 Petition for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 7/21/2010. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
