Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff: STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant: LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff: STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant: LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Lush, Stephen v. Burns, Lorie et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Stephen Lush
Defendant: Lorie Burns, Middleton Police Department, Steven Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3994
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff: Kenyon J McCall
Defendant: New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polk et al v. Somnia, Inc.
as 7:2022cv09549
Plaintiff: Randy Polk and Kelly Wilson
Defendant: Somnia, Inc.
Interested Party: Armando Carrasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09740
Plaintiff: KELLY WILSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILSON et al v. WALMART, INC. D/B/A WALMART SUPERCENTER et al
as 2:2021cv11215
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-4 (TRUE NAMES BEING UNKNOWN), ABC CORPORATIONS 1-4 (TRUE NAMES BEING UNKNOWN) and WALMART, INC. D/B/A WALMART SUPERCENTER
Plaintiff: KELLY WILSON and DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01859
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kelly Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?