Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MASON et al v. RAHMAN et al
as 2:2026cv03179
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE ELIZABETH MASON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TYRAL MASON and others
Defendant:
MASJID AL RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD JAMALUDDIN, ROBERT MARSHALL, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers et al v. 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11675
Plaintiff:
Desmond Chambers, Shemiaka Barnes, Devon C Tucker and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Bear Lake County, et al.
as 4:2024cv00555
Defendant:
Bear Lake County, DOES I through X, Chief Deputy Ryan Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Kellie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson et al v. Bear Lake County et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Bear Lake County, Ryan Larson, Deputy Sheriff Matt Kunz and others
Plaintiff:
Kellie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Lush, Stephen v. Burns, Lorie et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Lorie Burns, Middleton Police Department, Steven Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
