Johnson v. Boyd et al
| Arnold Johnson |
| BOYD, JOHNSON, WIZA, JONES, HOWELL, YANCEY and WESTON |
| 7:2011cv00088 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Lowndes |
| Thomas Q Langstaff |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
ORDER adopting 141 Report and Recommendations; denying 130 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 3/20/2019. (aks)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 74 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 10/6/2015. (aks)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER directing Plaintiff to supplement 74 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to include explanation of issues on appeal and to submit a proper motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, along with a certified copy of his trust fund account statement. Submissions must be made within 21 days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 8/28/2015. (aks)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 43 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 12/5/2012. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 33 Report and Recommendations; denying 36 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/16/2012. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
