Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mouille v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC
as 1:2026cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Mouille
Defendant:
Boyd Biloxi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Savinovich v. Education Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv08085
Defendant:
Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros, Jeffrey Brain and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Savinovich
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boyd v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv06050
Plaintiff:
Curtis Boyd
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Haham v. Education Plus Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv01735
Defendant:
Emmanuel Argiros, Cindy Argiros, Jeffrey Brain and others
Plaintiff:
Daniella Haham
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Strong, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2026cv00932
Plaintiff:
Neicole Marie Lewis
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Tojuanna Y Mack, Earnest L. Giles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. ODUM et al
as 5:2026cv00648
Plaintiff:
EMMERETT WHEELER
Defendant:
DAMIAN ODUM and BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION, LLC DBA BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Theresa Davis v. Steffany Boyd
as 26-2243
Plaintiff:
THERESA DAVIS, JADA DAVIS, individually and on behalf of her minor child J.D. and ASHLYN DAVIS, on behalf of her minor child N.D.
Defendant:
STEFFANY E. BOYD
Johnson v. Doe
as 7:2026cv00374
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Physician John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
