THOMAS v. BLAKELY et al
| CALVIN THOMAS, JR |
| Dr. MOODY, WOODS, TAYLOR, Warden BLAKELY and CLARKE |
| 7:2018cv00171 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RECAST #1 Complaint against BLAKELY, TAYLOR, WOODS, CLARKE by CALVIN THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Recast Complaint filed by CALVIN THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and providing for amendment. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $42.70. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 11/2/2018 (TQL)
|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CALVIN THOMAS, JR. (sbd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CALVIN THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BLAKELY, MOODY, TAYLOR, WOODS, filed by CALVIN THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
