Bear v. United States of America et al
| Michael Bear |
| United States of America, Martin and Unknown Medical Staff of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2016cv00102 |
| January 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John K Larkins |
| Thomas W. Thrash |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 63 Final Report and Recommendation and GRANTING 59 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/25/2018. (jkl)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 55 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 51 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default/Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 4/13/18. (jkl)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER approving and adopting 10 Non-Final Report and Recommendations. The FTCA claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Bivens claims for deliberate indifference to his medical needs and conspiracy against Dr. Martin and unknown medica l staff at USP Atlanta be ALLOWED TO PROCEED. A Bivens claim for retaliation against Dr. Martin should also be ALLOWED TO PROCEED. Plaintiffs claim for injunctive relief against Dr. Martin and USP Atlanta medical staff should be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 6/15/16. (jkl) Text modified on 6/16/2016 (jkl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
