Jones v. Edwards
James Jones |
Sgt. M. D. Edwards |
1:2019cv05230 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
Catherine M Salinas |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (rjs)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation as the Opinion and Order of this Court. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not appear that Plaintiff intended to file another federal civil action in this Court at this time. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/6/2020. (rjs) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Jones re #5 Order and #6 Clerk's Judgment. (rjs) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rjs) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rjs) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/13/2019. (rjs) |
Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not appear that Plaintiff intended to file another federal civil action in this Court at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/13/2019. (rjs) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Jones re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rjs) |
ORDER DENYING as moot In Forma Pauperis. (found in the #3 R&R) Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/13/2019. (rjs) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by James Jones. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, titled, Notice of Appeal filed by James Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified text on 11/25/2019 (eop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Edwards | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sgt. M. D. Edwards | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.