Seitz v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
| Donna L. Seitz |
| Thomas Benson, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Target Corporation and Red Rock Risk Retention Group, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv03423 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered dismissing action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to comply with a lawfulorder of the Court. (dob)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 15
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to comply with a lawful order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 10/2/2020. (dob)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (dob) |
|
Filing 14
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Donna L. Seitz.(Merritt, Julia) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 12
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint that properly alleges the citizenship of each party in this case and that otherwise establishes subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/18/2020. (dob)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, Target Corporation Answer due 10/5/2020. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/11/2020. (dob)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Extending Time for Target to Answer Complaint)(Dermer, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
|
| Filing 8 Return of Service Executed by Donna L. Seitz. Target Corporation served on 8/24/2020, answer due 9/14/2020. (Cheeley, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 7/24/2020. (bgt)
|
|
Filing 5
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 8/3/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Thomas Benson. (eop) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (eop) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Red Rock Risk Retention Group, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Donna L. Seitz. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-10040294) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
