Warren v. City of Atlanta et al
| Tinika S. Warren |
| City of Atlanta, Larry S. Dooley, Stacey Abrams and Keisha Lance Bottoms |
| 1:2020mi00062 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER, by docket entry only, denying as moot #7 Motion: Criminal Interference with Qualified Applicant Rights and EEOC Rights, FBI.gov Conspiracy Against Rights Under the Color of Law. By Judge Amy Totenberg on 8/10/20. (hfm)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tinika S. Warren re Docket Entry Only Order on Motion: Criminal Interference with Qualified Applicant Rights and EEOC Rights, FBI.gov Conspiracy Against Rights Under the Color of Law. (hfm) |
| Submission of #7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (bnp) |
| Filing 7 MOTION: Criminal Interference with Qualified Applicant Rights and EEOC Rights, FBI.gov Conspiracy Against Rights Under the Color of Law filed by Tinika S. Warren. (ddm) |
|
ORDER, by docket entry only. On May 19, 2020, Plaintiff Tinika Warren, was placed on a filing restriction by the Honorable Steven D. Grimberg that required a frivolity review by a Judge of this Court prior to allowing any further actions filed by Plaintiff to proceed. On June 18, 2020, Plaintiffs Application to Proceed ifp in this action was submitted to the undersigned for a frivolity review as the acting Duty Judge for the month. The frivolity review determined that Plaintiff's claims were indeed frivolous and her application to proceed ifp denied. Accordingly, as this actions was denied standing to proceed, Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Change Venue and #6 Motion: Former Employee Board Member Abrams and Others Conspired Violating the False Claims Act are DENIED AS MOOT. By Judge Amy Totenberg on 7/20/20. (hfm)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tinika S. Warren re NEF of Order by docket entry only. (hfm) |
| Filing 6 MOTION: Former Employee Board Member Abrams and Others Conspired Violating the False Claims Act filed by Tinika S. Warren. (ddm) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Change Venue by Tinika S. Warren. (eop) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #3 Motion: Dekalb County Superior Court Indictments / Stalkers / Womens Domestic Violence Act, FHA Rights Interference with exercising Civil Rights Social Media, Radio, TV Real Time Feeds on Teleprompters. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 7/2/2020. (eop)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tinika S. Warren re #4 Order. (eop) |
| Filing 3 MOTION: Dekalb County Superior Court Indictments/Stalkers/Womens Domestic Violence Act, FHA Rights Interference with exercising Civil Rights Social Media, Radio, TV Real Time Feeds on Teleprompters filed by Tinika S. Warren. (ddm) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to File Complaint. This Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Proposed Complaint and finds that leave to file should not be granted because Plaintiff's proposed claims are frivolous. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 06/26/2020. (rvb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tinika S. Warren re #2 Order. (rvb) |
| Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (rvb) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for Leave to File, to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (eop) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Tinika S. Warren. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Restricted Order -1:20-cv-145-SDG)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
