Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thomas, Jr. v. Prine et al
as 1:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jr. James Prine, Margaret Chapura, Everlyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mario Johnson v. Heliogen, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv06297
Plaintiff:
Mario Johnson
Defendant:
Heliogen, Inc., Julie M. Kane, Paddy Padmanathan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Sullivan v. Buffet et al
as 3:2025cv00764
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Warren Buffet, Mark Bezos, Jerome Powell and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sullivan v. Bezos et al
as 3:2025cv00385
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bezos, Stacey Abrams, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Felix Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Governor Brian Kemp, Alashia Thomas, Searcy G.S. School and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rojas v. Warnock et al
as 1:2022cv05742
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Raphael Warnock, Warnock for Georgia, Stacey Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abrams v. Ceteris Portfolio Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv05814
Plaintiff:
Stacey Abrams
Defendant:
Ceteris Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Warren v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2020mi00062
Plaintiff:
Tinika S. Warren
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Larry S. Dooley, Stacey Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
