Watlington v. Carvajal
| Daniel Watlington |
| Michael Carvajal |
| 1:2022cv00087 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING nunc pro tunc #5 motion for extension of time. Respondent's response shall be due no later than 03/10/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 02/28/2022. (jxr)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Court's Show Cause Order re: #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition, with Brief In Support by Michael Carvajal. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Melaine) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Returned Receipt re Clerks Certificate of Mailing, #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, delivered 2/3/2022. (tmf) |
| Submission of #2 MOTION for Hearing, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (tmf) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing Clerk to perfect service of petition and order on respondent by certified mail, with copy to U.S. Attorney. Respondent is directed to show cause within 28 days of receipt of order why writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 1/26/2022. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Daniel Watlington re #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition,. (tmf) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing via ERR 7020 0090 0001 2528 8174 as to Michael Carvajal re #3 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition, #1 Habeas Petition, #2 Motion. Mail sent to Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First St., NW, Washington, DC 20534 (as found on BOP website). (tmf) Modified on 1/26/2022 to edit text and doc links(tmf). Modified on 1/27/2022 to add tracking number(tmf). |
| Filing 2 (construed by clerk) MOTION for Hearing by Daniel Watlington. (tmf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel Watlington. ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number GAN100135380.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Review, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watlington v. Carvajal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Watlington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Carvajal | |
| Represented By: | Melaine A. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
