Tran et al v. Garland et al
Nga Thi Tran and Phong Van Phan |
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Christopher Wray and Kirt Thompson |
1:2022cv00346 |
January 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Thomas W Thrash |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(i) (jra) |
Civil Case Terminated. (jra) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Nga Thi Tran & Phong Van Phan (Goldstein, Christina) Modified on 3/14/2022 to edit text (jra). |
Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kirt Thompson. (tas) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Christopher Wray. (tas) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (tas) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (tas) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland. (tas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Nga Thi Tran, Phong Van Phan. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11551134) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.