Patel v. Garland et al
| Sachinkumar Rameshchandra Patel |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Shineka Scott Miller and Christopher Wray |
| 1:2022cv01710 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kurt R. Erskine, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia. (bgt) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Christopher Wray. (bgt) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (bgt) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland. (bgt) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Shineka Scott Miller. (bgt) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (bgt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11769434) filed by Sachinkumar Rameshchandra Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (bgt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
