Oka v. Target Corporation
| Adanna Gail Oka |
| Target Corporation |
| 1:2022cv04402 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered DISMISSING action pursuant to USC 1915(e) (2). (dob)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs, case isDISMISSED pursuant to U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/28/2022. (dob)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (dob) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Adanna Gail Oka re #6 Clerk's Judgment, #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (dob) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/7/22. (klb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Complaint, filed by Adanna Gail Oka. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/7/22. (klb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Adanna Gail Oka. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(klb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (found in text of Order and Final Report & Recommendation). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/7/22. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Adanna Gail Oka re #4 Order for Service of Order and Final Report and Recommendation and #3 ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (klb) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (ane) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adanna Gail Oka. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oka v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adanna Gail Oka | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
