Charles Hartman v. Polite et al
| Charles Hartman |
| Warden Polite, Warden McDay, Unit Manager Jamerson, Officer Baptise, Billings and Sergeant Dunkan |
| 1:2024cv00284 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Linda T Walker |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (ces)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the R&R as the opinion of this Court. #3 . For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 3/4/24. (ces)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (ces) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Charles Hartman re #6 Clerk's Judgment, #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (ces) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Charles Hartman, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Charles Hartman re #4 Order, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (jbu) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/13/2024. (jbu)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is deficient because it lacks (1) a signed and dated authorization allowing his custodian to deduct funds from his inmate account; (2) a certificate completed, signed, and dated by an authorized institutional officer; and (3) a certified copy of Plaintiff's inmate account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application is DENIED without prejudice. Nevertheless, Plaintiff shall be GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/13/2024. c:Financial Office(jbu)
|
|
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED without prejudice for deficiency reasons. However, Plaintiff shall be GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only. (Ruled on in #3 Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/13/2024. c:Financial Office(jbu)
|
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (tht) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Charles Hartman. (tht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charles Hartman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
