Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hartman v. McDay et al
as 1:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Warden Courtney McDay, Sergeant Duncan, Unit Manager Jamerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTMAN v. CLARK et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARTMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN CLARK, FARMER, Dr WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Floyd Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Floyd Sheriff Office, Tim Burkhalter, Major Pledger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Warden Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Hollis et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Lt. Hollis, Sgt. Richardson, Sgt. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Siebert
as 4:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Officer Siebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Floyd Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Floyd Sheriff Office, Major Pledger, Misty Pledger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hartman v. Paulding County Sheriff, et al
as 21-13559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HARTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
PAULDING COUNTY SHERIFF, THOMAS, ELLINGTON and others
Hartman v. Paulding County Sheriff et al
as 4:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Paulding County Sheriff, Captain Thomas, Sgt Ellington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
