Hamilton v. Hill et al
| Charles Hamilton |
| Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson, Levon Allen, K. Crews, Elizabeth Smith, Correct Health, LLC, Correct Health Clayton, LLC, Dr. Charles Clopton, M.D., Tiffanie Mitchell, Deborah Pilgrim, Mamie Miller, Joan Tapper, Teresa Nicholson, John Sims, Ramonica Jordan and Shena Carter |
| 1:2024cv00941 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (tht) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Charles Hamilton (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons)(Upshaw, Christopher) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/4/2024. (bnp)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13262555) filed by Charles Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
