Cases 1 - 10 of 78
SIMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2025cv00501
Petitioner:
JOHN SIMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMS v. WARDEN
as 2:2025cv00502
Petitioner:
JOHN SIMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2025cv00338
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SCOTT, TRICIA PRETORIOUS, KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Halcarz et al
as 3:2025cv00143
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Defendant:
Tori J Halcarz, Gilliam, Aries and others
Unknown:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv12399
Defendant:
LOreal USA, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC and LOreal USA Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emerson v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv04843
Defendant:
April Cameron, Tevin E. Jones, Thomas T. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Tracie Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Orth et al
as 3:2024cv00672
Defendant:
Raglin, Orth, Monerpenny and others
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Defendant:
Wheeler, Monerpenny, Raglin and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
