Haimanio v. DeKalb County Police Department et al
| APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO |
| DeKalb County Police Department, MONICA PANOSIAN, Gregory Moore, MIRTHA V RAMOS, Sherry Boston, Michael L. Thurmond and DEKALB COUNTY ET AL |
| 1:2024cv00949 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Sarah E Geraghty |
| John K Larkins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE Of Filing Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts by Apojon Papa Haimanio (ane) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Apojon Papa Haimanio re #9 Order.(ane) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have up to and including May 27, 2024, to file any objections to the #6 R&R. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 4/19/2024. (ane)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the #6 Final Report and Recommendation by Apojon Papa Haimanio. (ane) |
| Submission of #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (sap) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Service of #6 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 3/14/2024. (nmb)
|
| Filing 6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the #1 Complaint filed by Apojon Papa Haimanio be DISMISSED under Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 for lack of standing and jurisdiction, or, alternatively, as frivolous under 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 3/14/2024. (nmb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Apojon Papa Haimanio re #7 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (nmb) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:23-cv-03827. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Submission of #1 Complaint, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (aar) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER transferring case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. See attached Order for details. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the case forthwith. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/12/2024. (lctnm3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.]
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Transfer due by 3/2/2024. (hmc) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.] |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO. (mg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.] |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/3/2024. (lctnm3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.]
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 206279) with Jury Demand filed by APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zdp) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.] |
| Summons (7) Issued as to All Defendants. (zdp) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/4/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
