Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Haimanio v. DeKalb County Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant:
DeKalb County Police Department, MONICA PANOSIAN, Gregory Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIMANIO v. DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03827
Plaintiff:
APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant:
DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MONICA PANOSIAN, GREGORY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32928
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore, Jr. v. BPS Direct, LLC
as 2:2023cv02287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08662
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Moore v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Gregory Moore, Jr. v. Carhartt, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Carhartt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine
Moore v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Moore, Jr. v. BPS Direct, LLC
as 3:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Gregory Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
BPS Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
