Zeenat v. Blinken et al
Shamsa Zeenat |
Merrick B. Garland, Andrew Schofer, Antony J. Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rena Bitter, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Donald Blome and Christopher Wray |
1:2024cv02815 |
June 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address for Shamsa Zeenat. (tas) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 6/26/2024. (tas) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken, Donald Blome, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Andrew Schofer, Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(gww) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Shamsa Zeenat re #3 Order. (tas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $405, receipt number 100012496) filed by Shamsa Zeenat. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(gww) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.