Nally v. Smith et al
| Paul L. Nally |
| Jim Hammond, James Woodruff and Chuck Smith |
| 3:2019cv00096 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Newnan Office |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER for Service of #8 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 09/30/2019. (usw)
|
|
Filing 8
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus that this action be DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 11(a) and for Schafer's failure to obey the Court's order of August 16, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 09/30/2019. (usw)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Paul L. Nally re #8 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #9 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (usw) |
| Submission of #7 MOTION to Dismiss, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (tcc) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION to Dismiss by Paul L. Nally. (usw) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING Schafer to submit a personally signed amended petition within 30 of the entry date of this order. Schafer must name her immediate custodian as the proper respondent to this action and must complete in detail and submit the habeas corpus form petition that will be provided to her by the Clerk of Court with this Order. The Clerk SHALL stamp the civil action number on a copy of this Court's 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas corpus form and forward the form to Schafer, together with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 08/16/2019. (usw)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Paul L. Nally re #6 Order and stamped 28:2241 Forms. (usw) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Eastern; Case Number 1:18-cv-00173. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (no Filing Fee or IFP) (aar) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT ORDER. The Court ORDERS that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for Northern District of Georgia, at Newnan, and removed from the docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/8/2019. (AML) Mailed to Paul L. Nally [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 8/9/2019.]
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM. The Court will ORDER that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for Northern District of Georgia, at Newnan, and removed from the docket of this Court. An Order Will Enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/8/2019. (AML) Mailed to Paul L. Nally [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 8/9/2019.]
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Paul L Nally. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(AML, ) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 8/9/2019.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Paul L Nally. Filing Fee of $5.00 paid, Receipt No. C1015819.(AML, ) [Transferred from Tennessee Eastern on 8/9/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
