Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant:
Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Great Divide Insurance Co et al
as 5:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Billy "Chuck" Smith, Kimberly Smith and Billy Smith
Defendant:
Great Divide Insurance Company, Nautilus Insurance Company, James Harshman, LLC D/B/A Diamond Edge Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pullen v. Tabor et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Mr. David Warren, Fri, Lt Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Smith
as 3:2019cv00150
Petitioner:
Brian Roberts, Jr.
Respondent:
Chuck Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jane Doe v. Chuck Smith
as 19-13523
Defendant / Appellee:
CHUCK SMITH, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Nally v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Respondent:
Jim Hammond, James Woodruff and Chuck Smith
Petitioner:
Paul L. Nally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45306
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Chuck Smith in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jane Doe v. Stephen Sheely, et al
as 19-11128
Defendant / Appellee:
CHUCK SMITH, in his individual capacity and STEPHEN ROBERT SHEELY, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
