Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Southern District Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al

Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al

Case Number:	1:2005cv00099
Filed:	July 6, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Augusta Office
Presiding Judge:	W. Leon Barfield
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 9, 2009	Filing 366 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 354 Motion To Review Taxation of Costs Awarded by Clerk to Private Defendants; granting in part and denying in part 355 Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Review Taxation of Costs Awarded by Clerk to Stat e Defendants; directing the Clerk to tax the costs against the Plaintiff in favor of the Private Defendants and State Defendants as directed in this Order; overruling Plaintiff's objection as to his financial situation; overruling Plaintiff' ;s objections to to deposition costs taxed; overruling the photocopy objection based on the rejection of Plaintiff's preferred peer-review method; substaining the objection to the photocopy rate charged; overruling the objection regarding the ph otocopy of each paper of each paper pleading that was filed electronically; and overruling the objection to the costs in the case which would not have been taxed but for the removal from state court to federal court. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11-09-09. (thb) Modified on 11/9/2009 (thb).
February 7, 2008	Filing 266 ORDER that Defendants' 261 Motion to Reopen the Case and Defendants' 262 Joint Motion to Reinstate Previous Motions are GRANTED IN PART; the captioned case shall be REOPENED and restored to the active trial docket; ALL MOTIONS that were p ending as of the Court's October 26, 2007 Order and all materials related to said motions are hereby REINSTATED; consequently, Plaintiff's 263 Motion to Reinstate Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and/or Motion for Sanctions is DENIED AS MOOT; the parties shall have SIXTY (60) days from the date of this Order to complete discovery, as limited in the Court's Order of August 24, 2007; Defendants shall have FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from close of discovery to supplement their materials in support of summary judgment; thereafter, Plaintiff shall have FIFTEEN (15) DAYS to supplement his response; any supplemental brief filed regarding the pending motions for summary judgment SHALL BE LIMITED to issues raised by the production of confide ntial peer review material pursuant to "Adkins"; in regards to the reinstated motions, Defendants' 247 Motion to Modify the Protective Order is GRANTED; accordingly, the Court will simultaneously enter Defendants' proposed modified protective order w/ this Order; and, Plaintiff's 246 Motion to Compel and/or Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lisa G Wood on 02/07/08. (jah)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 9, 2009

Filing 366 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 354 Motion To Review Taxation of Costs Awarded by Clerk to Private Defendants; granting in part and denying in part 355 Motion Plaintiff's Motion to Review Taxation of Costs Awarded by Clerk to Stat e Defendants; directing the Clerk to tax the costs against the Plaintiff in favor of the Private Defendants and State Defendants as directed in this Order; overruling Plaintiff's objection as to his financial situation; overruling Plaintiff' ;s objections to to deposition costs taxed; overruling the photocopy objection based on the rejection of Plaintiff's preferred peer-review method; substaining the objection to the photocopy rate charged; overruling the objection regarding the ph otocopy of each paper of each paper pleading that was filed electronically; and overruling the objection to the costs in the case which would not have been taxed but for the removal from state court to federal court. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11-09-09. (thb) Modified on 11/9/2009 (thb).

February 7, 2008

Filing 266 ORDER that Defendants' 261 Motion to Reopen the Case and Defendants' 262 Joint Motion to Reinstate Previous Motions are GRANTED IN PART; the captioned case shall be REOPENED and restored to the active trial docket; ALL MOTIONS that were p ending as of the Court's October 26, 2007 Order and all materials related to said motions are hereby REINSTATED; consequently, Plaintiff's 263 Motion to Reinstate Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and/or Motion for Sanctions is DENIED AS MOOT; the parties shall have SIXTY (60) days from the date of this Order to complete discovery, as limited in the Court's Order of August 24, 2007; Defendants shall have FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from close of discovery to supplement their materials in support of summary judgment; thereafter, Plaintiff shall have FIFTEEN (15) DAYS to supplement his response; any supplemental brief filed regarding the pending motions for summary judgment SHALL BE LIMITED to issues raised by the production of confide ntial peer review material pursuant to "Adkins"; in regards to the reinstated motions, Defendants' 247 Motion to Modify the Protective Order is GRANTED; accordingly, the Court will simultaneously enter Defendants' proposed modified protective order w/ this Order; and, Plaintiff's 246 Motion to Compel and/or Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lisa G Wood on 02/07/08. (jah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?