Reynolds v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Reynolds v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Petitioner:	Donald M. Reynolds
Respondent:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	1:2009cv00061
Filed:	June 8, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Augusta Office
County:	Richmond
Presiding Judge:	W. Leon Barfield
Presiding Judge:	Dudley H. Bowen
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2010	Filing 45 ORDER finding as moot 34 Motion to take Judicial Notice ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations.; denying [41-1] Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as Moot [41-2] Motion to incorporate judicial motions; finding as moo t 6 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 20 Motion to take Judicial notice. Objections are Overruled. Denies petitioner a certificate of Appealability. This case is closed and final judgment shall be entered in favor of respondent. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 3/17/10. (aeh) Modified text on 3/17/2010 (aeh). Modified on 3/17/2010 (aeh).
January 26, 2010	Filing 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Petitioner's 2255 Motion be denied without an evidentiary hearing; that the other pending motions 6 , 20 , 34 be denied as moot and that this civil action be closed and final judgement be entered in favor of respondend, re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Donald M. Reynolds Objections to R&R due by 2/12/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Leon Barfield on 1/26/10. (aeh) Modified on 1/27/2010 (aeh).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2010

Filing 45 ORDER finding as moot 34 Motion to take Judicial Notice ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations.; denying [41-1] Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as Moot [41-2] Motion to incorporate judicial motions; finding as moo t 6 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 20 Motion to take Judicial notice. Objections are Overruled. Denies petitioner a certificate of Appealability. This case is closed and final judgment shall be entered in favor of respondent. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 3/17/10. (aeh) Modified text on 3/17/2010 (aeh). Modified on 3/17/2010 (aeh).

January 26, 2010

Filing 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Petitioner's 2255 Motion be denied without an evidentiary hearing; that the other pending motions 6 , 20 , 34 be denied as moot and that this civil action be closed and final judgement be entered in favor of respondend, re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Donald M. Reynolds Objections to R&R due by 2/12/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Leon Barfield on 1/26/10. (aeh) Modified on 1/27/2010 (aeh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reynolds v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald M. Reynolds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Amy Lee Copeland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?