Price v. Deal et al
Jason Todd Price |
Nathan Deal, Department of Administrative Service Risk Management, Georgia Department of Corrections and Warden, Augusta State Medical Prison |
1:2012cv00059 |
April 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Richmond |
W. Leon Barfield |
J. Randal Hall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 49 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court; that Defendants' 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; that a final judgment be entered in favor the Defendants; and that this civil action is closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/25/2014. (jah) |
Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 22 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Defendant Nicholes and Georgia Department of Corrections from this case; and, dismissing Defendants Nathan Deal and the Department of Administrative Service Risk Management and Plaintiff's official capacity claims for monetary relief. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/14/2012. (jah) |
Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's 15 objections are OVERRULED; that the 10 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and, that the Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/11/2012. (jah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.