Gold Cross EMS, Inc. v. The Children's Hospital of Alabama
| Gold Cross EMS, Inc. |
| The Children's Hospital of Alabama |
| The Children's Hospital of Alabama |
| Gold Cross EMS, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv00081 |
| May 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Columbia |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER DISMISSING CASE that, subsequent to the filing of the parties' 91 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, the Court dismisses with prejudice all claims remaining in this matter. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/24/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 71 Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/14/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER denying Plaintiff Gold Cross EMS, Inc.'s 62 Motion for Reconsideration; and declining Gold Cross's requests for certification to the Georgia Supreme Court or interlocutory review. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/01/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant The Children's Hospital of Alabama's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case shall proceed to trial on all remaining claims. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/8/2015. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
