Morrall v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Joseph Morrall, Jr. |
CitiMortgage, Inc., Freddie Mac, Pendergast & Associates, P.C. and Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP |
1:2014cv00086 |
April 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Richmond |
Brian K. Epps |
J. Randal Hall |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER DISMISSING with prejudice all claims in this matter. The Clerk shall terminate all deadlines and motions and close this case. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/17/2015. (thb) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure claim based on Citi's purported failure to provide notice shall proceed, as well as Mr. Morrall's claim for declaratory relief. Accor dingly, with the exception of Plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure claim and claim for declaratory relief, the Court dismisses with prejudice all remaining claims against Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. The 7 Motion to Dismiss, 8 Motion to Dism iss, and 9 Motion to Dismiss are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate parties Freddie Mac, Pendergast & Associates, P.C., and Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP as defendants in this action, as well as all deadlines and motions pertaining to them. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/25/2015. (thb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.