Morrall v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Morrall, Jr.
Defendant: CitiMortgage, Inc., Freddie Mac, Pendergast & Associates, P.C. and Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP
Case Number: 1:2014cv00086
Filed: April 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER DISMISSING with prejudice all claims in this matter. The Clerk shall terminate all deadlines and motions and close this case. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/17/2015. (thb)
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure claim based on Citi's purported failure to provide notice shall proceed, as well as Mr. Morrall's claim for declaratory relief. Accor dingly, with the exception of Plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure claim and claim for declaratory relief, the Court dismisses with prejudice all remaining claims against Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. The 7 Motion to Dismiss, 8 Motion to Dism iss, and 9 Motion to Dismiss are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate parties Freddie Mac, Pendergast & Associates, P.C., and Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP as defendants in this action, as well as all deadlines and motions pertaining to them. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/25/2015. (thb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morrall v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Morrall, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CitiMortgage, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony E. Maselli
Represented By: John F. Pendergast, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freddie Mac
Represented By: Anthony E. Maselli
Represented By: John F. Pendergast, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Represented By: Anthony E. Maselli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP
Represented By: Thomas W. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?