Stephens v. Access Secure Pak Remington Returns Center
Edwin Darnell Stephens |
Access Secure Pak Remington Returns Center, Access Secure Pak Manufactors and Staff's at Remington Returns Center |
1:2014cv00156 |
July 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Richmond |
Brian K. Epps |
J. Randal Hall |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 20 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/27/2015. (thb) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/26/2015. (thb) |
Filing 16 ORDER vacating the December 10th Adoption Order; overruling Plaintiff's objections. The Court adopts the 11 Report and Recommendation, dismisses Plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and closes this civil action. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/12/2015. (thb) |
Filing 13 ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and closing this civil aciton. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/10/2014. (thb) |
Filing 8 ORDER instructing the plaintiff to complete and submit a new prisoner trust fund account statement, (Compliance due by 10/7/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/18/14. (cmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.