Goodridge et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2015cv00093
Filed: June 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that the Defendants' 4 Motion to Dismiss is hereby granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 7/22/2015. (jah)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting the Defendants' 8 Motion to Stay and stays all pretrial deadlines, including discovery deadlines set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court, pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. If the motion to dismiss is denied, the parties shall confer as required by Local Rule 26.1 within seven (7) days of Judge Hall's ruling, and within fourteen (14) days of the ruling, they shall submit a joint Rule 26(f) Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 7/17/2015. (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodridge et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?