Brewer v. Bryson et al
Michael Lane Brewer |
Homer Bryson and Samuel S. Olens |
1:2015cv00100 |
July 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Coffee |
Brian K. Epps |
J. Randal Hall |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER overruling Petitioner's objections to the R&R; adopting 29 Report and Recommendation; denying 27 Motion for Application of and a Finding that the State Corrective Process is Ineffective to Protect the Rights of the Petitioner; grant ing 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. The petition is dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. The Court denies a COA in this case. The Court closes this civil action and directs the Clerk to enter an appropriate final judgment. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/06/2016. (thb) |
Filing 28 ORDER finding as moot 25 Motion for Leave to File; denying 26 Motion for docket sheet report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/13/2015. (thb) |
Filing 9 ORDER overruling 8 Objections. As one-time courtesy, the Court directs the Clerk to send Petitioner a copy of the docket sheet, as he requested. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/26/2015. (thb) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion; and terminating 6 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/7/15. (cmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.