Paschall et al v. Salem Nursing & Rehab Center of Augusta, Inc. et al
| Louise Paschall, Gayla Jean Esperitu, Connie J. Frazier, Sheila Rozier, Angela D. Lowery and Tina Marie Jones |
| Salem Nursing & Rehab Center of Augusta, Inc., Altacare Corporation, Douglas Mittleider, John Doe Corporate Defendants 1-10 and John Doe Individual Defendants 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv00167 |
| October 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Wilkes |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 71 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for the reasons stated in the Clerk of Court's Notice of Filing Deficiency with the right to refile following all requirements of Local Rule 83.4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/23/2019. (jlh) Modified on 7/23/2019 (jlh).
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Vacate the stay; granting motion to respond to 14 Motion to Certify Class. Defendants shall refile their motion to dismiss by 4/4/16 and shall respond to Plaintiffs' motion to certify by 4/11/16. The parties are instructed to inform the Court within 7 days from the date of this order whether the motion to dismiss currently pending on the Court's docket should be removed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/31/16. (cmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
