Plumbers and Steamfitters Local No. 150 Pension Fund et al v. Muns Group, Inc. et al
| Plumbers and Steamfitters Local No. 150 Pension Fund, Jeffrey Rice, Rory LaFontaine, John Lewis Robertson, Larry L. Hall, Jr. and Clay Harley |
| Muns Group, Inc., Muns Mechanical, Inc. and C & M Equipment Leasing, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00200 |
| December 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Richmond |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1381 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER re the Court's 33 Order dated August 26, 2016, the Plaintiffs' 34 Notice of Filing of Declaration of Jeffrey D. Gordon, and the Court's recalculation of Plaintiffs' counsel's attorney's fees, that the Court directs the Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT against Defendants in the amount of $3,228,573.45. The Court further instructs the Clerk to CLOSE this case and TERMINATE all deadlines. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/22/2017. (jah)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Strike; granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court directs the Pension Fund to file their computation of damages within twenty-one days. Defendants will have fourteen days to respond to the Fund's filing. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/26/2016. (thb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
