Shank v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Folanda Shank
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2016cv00030
Filed: March 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in accordance with the Order of this Court entered on 4/12/17. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 4/12/17. (cmr)
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER setting plaintiff's brief deadline, (Brief due by 7/29/2016). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/29/16. (cmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shank v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Folanda Shank
Represented By: Patrick B. Cates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Daniel R. Crumby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?