Tidwell et al v. Chattanooga Fire Protection, Inc. et al
Douglas Tidwell and David Keith Leggett |
Chattanooga Fire Protection, Inc. and Joseph Anthony Bishop |
1:2017cv00030 |
March 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Columbia |
Brian K. Epps |
J. Randal Hall |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. This case stands closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/6/2018. (pts) |
Filing 33 ORDER and Notice of Pretrial Proceedings. The Court Orders lead counsel for the parties to meet and confer, in person, and prepare and file with the Clerk of this Court one consolidated proposed pretrial order. (Motions in Limine and Evidentiary Obj ections due by 1/3/2019, Pretrial Order due by 12/20/2018.), (Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/31/2019 10:00 AM in Augusta - 2nd Floor before Chief Judge J. Randal Hall, Jury Selection set for 2/4/2019 09:00 AM in Augusta - 2nd Floor before Chief Judge J. Randal Hall.) Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/29/2018. (pts) |
Filing 26 ORDER finding the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case at this time, and that the case shall proceed. Further, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to correct docket entry 24 Response filed by Douglas Tidwell, to reflect the document is the Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/10/2017. (pts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.