Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
| George W. Hardy |
| Georgia Department of Corrections, Stan Shepard, Bruce Chatman, Mary Gore, Edward Hale Burnside, II, Kimberly Fountain, Lewis Gates, Shonte Wells, Elizabeth West, Timothy Young, Linda F. Giddens, Betty Lee McGrew, Unknown Augusta State Medical Prison Nurses, Unknown Prison Health Service Provider and Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia |
| 1:2017cv00172 |
| December 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Richmond |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDERED that the 99 USCA Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is made the Order of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/6/21. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion is granted as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against Nurse Giddens, Nurse Wells, Ms. West, Warden Shepard, and Deputy War den McGrew and denied as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against Dr. Fountain for direct liability. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Nurse Giddens, Nurse Wells, Ms. West, Warden Shepard, and Deputy Warden McGrew. Accordingly , this case shall proceed to trial as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against Dr. Fountain and Plaintiff's state law claims against the Georgia Department of Corrections and the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/13/2021. (ca)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re 66 Stipulation of Dismissal. This matter is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant Timothy Young, M.D. The Clerk is directed to terminate Defendant Young as a party to this case and any motions pertaining to him. Plaintiff and Defendant Young shall bear their own costs, fees, and expenses with respect to each other. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 04/06/2020. (thb)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Chatman, Burnside, and Gore as parties and any deadlines pertaining to them. The remaining Defendants shall file their answers to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint with in fourteen days of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/24/2019. (thb)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting Defendants' 44 Motion to Stay, and stays all discovery pending resolution of the partial 43 Motion to Dismiss. Within 7 days of the presiding District Judge's ruling, the remaining parties shall confer and submit a Rule26(f) Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/20/2018. (jlh)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be the operative complaint in this case. The Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Remand and finds as moot Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss; 31 Motion to Dismiss; 35 Motion to Dismiss; and 4 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/20/2018. (pts)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Stay. All Discovery is stayed pending the resolution of 4 Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 1/12/2018. (pts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
