State of Georgia v. Ellison
| 1:2018cv00017 |
| January 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Richmond |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 33 , 35 , 36 , and 38 Motions; denying as moot 34 , 37 40 , 41 and 42 Motions. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/30/2019. (jlh)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying Defendant's 19 and 22 Motions to Alter Judgment; denying 20 Motion for New Trial; and denying 25 Motion for Hearing. This case remains closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/18/2018. (jlh) Modified on 6/18/2018 (jlh).
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 17 Motion for Order, to receive case documents without prepayment of cost. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/5/2018. (jlh)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations as the Court's Opinion. Finding as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 12 Motion to Change Venue, and 13 Motion for Hearing. This case is dismissed. The Court also remands the six traffic cases to the State Court of Richmond County. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 2/21/2018. (jlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State of Georgia v. Ellison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
