Whitaker v. The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
| Demarcus Whitaker |
| James Rush, Michelle Reed, Donna Wear, Gina Thurman, Tracy Woods, Quincy Byrdsong, The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Robert Boehmer and Brooks Keel |
| 1:2018cv00141 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Demarcus Whitaker. (maa) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Demarcus Whitaker. (maa) |
Filing 4
ORDER providing Plaintiff with some basic instructions regarding the development and progression of this case and directing Plaintiff to serve Defendants within 90 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/04/2018. (maa)
|
|
Filing 3
RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 08/31/2018. (maa)
|
| Filing 2 REMARK: Receipt of Instructions by Demarcus Whitaker. (maa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Demarcus Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(maa) |
| Filing fee: $400.00, receipt number AUG024786. (maa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
