Davis v. Brooks et al
Petitioner: Charles F Davis
Respondent: Nathan Brooks
Undetermined: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Case Number: 1:2018cv00185
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. This action stands closed. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 12/12/2018. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/13/2018: #1 Corrected Judgment) (jlh).
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING the #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, overruling Petitioner's objections, and dismissing this petition filed pursuant to 28 USC 2254 without prejudice for failure to exhaust. The Court denies a COA in this case; moreover, Petitioner is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/12/2018. (jlh)
November 28, 2018 Filing 8 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations, by Charles F. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Letter and Envelope.)(jlh) Modified on 11/28/2018 (jlh).
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS be served on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/16/2018. (jlh)
November 16, 2018 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice and this civil action be closed. Objections to R&R due by 12/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/16/2018. (jlh)
November 14, 2018 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number AUG025164. (pts)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Filing Fee due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/26/2018. (pts)
October 24, 2018 Filing 4 Inmate Account Statement by Charles F Davis. (trb)
October 24, 2018 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM BRIEF by Charles F Davis. (trb) Modified on 10/25/2018 (jlh).
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles F Davis. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(trb)
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles F Davis. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Exhibits Pages 1-28, #3 Envelope)(trb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Brooks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nathan Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles F Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?