Dawson v. Perkins et al
John Henry Dawson, Jr. |
John M. Perkins and Richmond County Sheriff Office |
1:2019cv00067 |
May 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 DECLARATION by John Henry Dawson, Jr. (thb) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by John Henry Dawson, Jr. (thb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment by John Henry Dawson, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(pts) |
Filing 6 CONSENT by Prisoner John Henry Dawson, Jr. to collection of fees. (jlh) Modified on 5/29/2019 (jlh). |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John M. Perkins and Richmond County Sheriff Office, filed by John Henry Dawson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Supplement to Amended Complaint, #2 Letter, and #3 Envelope.)(jlh) |
![]() |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 6/13/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John Henry Dawson, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by John Henry Dawson, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John M. Perkins and Richmond County Sheriff Office, filed by John Henry Dawson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, and #2 Envelope.)(jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.