Varner v. Hire Technologies, Inc.
| Garris Varner |
| Hire Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00145 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Hire Technologies, Inc. answer due 11/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/25/2019. (jlh) Modified on 10/25/2019 (jlh).
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Hire Technologies, Inc.. Responses due by 11/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ellington, James) |
| MOTION REFERRED: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (jlh) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Garris Varner. Hire Technologies, Inc. served on 10/11/2019, answer due 11/1/2019. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice and granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/9/2019. (cjc)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Richard M. Schreiber Receipt Number 113J-2677865, Fee Amount $200, by Garris Varner. Responses due by 9/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Pro Hac Vice Supplement)(Lanier, Troy) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew W. Dunlap Receipt Number 113J-2677854, Fee Amount $200, by Garris Varner. Responses due by 9/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Pro Hac Vice Supplement)(Lanier, Troy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hire Technologies, Inc. (pts) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Forms) (pts)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Richard M. Schreiber Receipt Number 113J-2677865, Fee Amount $200, #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew W. Dunlap Receipt Number 113J-2677854, Fee Amount $200. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hire Technologies, Inc., filed by Garris Varner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(pts) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 113J-2677487. (pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Varner v. Hire Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hire Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James B. Ellington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garris Varner | |
| Represented By: | Troy A. Lanier |
| Represented By: | Andrew W. Dunlap |
| Represented By: | Richard M. Schreiber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
