DMG Group, LLC v. Diablo's Franchising, LLC et al
DMG Group, LLC |
Diablo's Franchising, LLC and John Doe Entities 1 through 20 |
1:2020cv00090 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Diablo's Franchising, LLC. Responses due by 9/7/2020. (Tarver, Edward) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by DMG Group, LLC Alternative Dispute Resolution and Case Management Procedures (Weston, James) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by DMG Group, LLC. (Weston, James) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by DMG Group, LLC. (Weston, James) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 7/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Pro Hac Vice Application)(thb) |
Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 06/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Blank forms for new civil case filings) (thb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Diablo's Franchising, LLC. (thb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diablo's Franchising, LLC, John Doe Entities 1 through 20, filed by DMG Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(thb) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number AGASDC-2870692. (thb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.