Adams v. McMillan
| Dana Marie Adams |
| Meosha McMillan and Sue Mickens |
| Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only) |
| 1:2020cv00135 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing by Sue Mickens re #9 Notice of Filing, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 5(c) a copy of volume 3 (of 4) of the transcript from Petitioners August 20, 2018, state habeas corpus evidentiary hearing., #2 Exhibit 5(d) a copy of volume 4 (of 4) of the transcript from Petitioners August 20, 2018, state habeas corpus evidentiary hearing., #3 Exhibit 6 a copy of the transcript from Petitioners January 8, 2019, state habeas corpus evidentiary hearing., #4 Exhibit 7 a copy of the appellants brief filed in Petitioners direct appeal, #5 Exhibit 8 a copy of the appellees brief filed in Petitioners direct appeal.)(Hill, Meghan) Modified on 11/20/2020 (pts). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing by Sue Mickens (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 a copy of the decision in Petitioners direct appeal, affirming her convictions and sentences for aggravated child molestation, child molestation, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor on December 20, 2016. Adams v. State, 340 Ga. App. 1, 795 S.E.2d 330 (2016)., #2 Exhibit 2 a copy of Petitioners state habeas corpus petition filed in Pulaski County on July 7, 2017., #3 Exhibit 3 a copy of the state habeas courts final order denying relief, filed on August 9, 2019., #4 Exhibit 4 a copy of the Georgia Supreme Courts order denying Petitioners application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal on April 20, 2020., #5 Exhibit 5(a) a copy of volume 1 (of 4) of the transcript from Petitioners August 20, 2018, state habeas corpus evidentiary hearing., #6 Exhibit 5(b) a copy of volume 2 (of 4) of the transcript from Petitioners August 20, 2018, state habeas corpus evidentiary hearing.)(Hill, Meghan) Modified on 11/20/2020 (pts). |
| Filing 8 ANSWER- RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Sue Mickens. (Attachments: #1 Briefs BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ANSWER-RESPONSE)(Hill, Meghan) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/15/2020. (cjc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-2944695, Fee Amount $200, by Dana Marie Adams. Responses due by 10/28/2020. (Goldberg, Ralph) |
| MOTION REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (jlh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan H. Hill on behalf of Sue Mickens (Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula K. Smith on behalf of Sue Mickens (Smith, Paula) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing Clerk to refund $395.00 counsel overpaid for the filing fee. The Court hereby orders Respondent to answer in writing the allegations of the petition within sixty days of the date of this Order. Sue Mickens answer due 11/24/2020. (Sue Mickens added, Meosha McMillan (Warden) terminated.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/25/2020. (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Meosha McMillan. (thb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Dana Marie Adams.(thb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (thb). |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number AGASDC-2931502. (thb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
