The Hale Foundation, Inc. v. Augusta, Georgia
| The Hale Foundation, Inc. |
| Augusta, Georgia |
| 1:2020cv00144 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Clerk's Extension of Time (LR 6.1) to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss, #8 MOTION to Stay All Discovery. Responses due by 12/15/2020. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/19/2020. (thb)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Clerk's Extension of Time (LR 6.1) to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss , #8 MOTION to Stay All Discovery by The Hale Foundation, Inc. Responses due by 12/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cosper, Christopher) Modified on 11/19/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay All Discovery by Augusta, Georgia. Responses due by 12/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Memo of Law in Support of Mtn to Stay Discovery)(Bennett, John) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Augusta, Georgia. Responses due by 12/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Ex. A to Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Bennett, John) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 MOTION to Stay All Discovery. (thb) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S EXTENSION ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Augusta, Georgia answer due 11/17/2020. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/30/2020. (thb) |
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Augusta, Georgia. Responses due by 11/13/2020. (Loken, Jacob) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (thb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Hale Foundation, Inc.. Augusta, Georgia served on 10/13/2020, answer due 11/3/2020. (Cosper, Christopher) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/07/2020. (maa)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Augusta, Georgia. (maa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Augusta, Georgia, filed by The Hale Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(maa) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number: AGASDC-2940627. (maa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Hale Foundation, Inc. v. Augusta, Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Augusta, Georgia | |
| Represented By: | John D. Bennett |
| Represented By: | Jacob W. Loken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Hale Foundation, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher A. Cosper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
