Boatwright v. Saul
| Demetrius Boatwright |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv00038 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Demetrius Boatwright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/29/2021. (ca)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice, and that this civil action be CLOSED re #1 Complaint filed by Demetrius Boatwright. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/29/2021. (ca) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to submit an amended complaint within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Form Pro Se 13) (pts)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 3/22/2021. (pts) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Demetrius Boatwright. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Demetrius Boatwright. (Attachment: #1 Envelope.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
