Swanson v. Raffensperger
Plaintiff: Brian D. Swanson
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Case Number: 1:2022cv00011
Filed: February 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
Presiding Judge: Brian K Epps
Referring Judge: J Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Brian D. Swanson. (wwp)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay Discovery. The Court STAYS all aspects of discovery in this action pending resolution of Defendants re #6 Motion to Dismiss. Should any portion of the case remain after resolution of the motion, the parties shall confer and submit a Rule 26(f) Report, with proposed case deadlines, within seven days of the presiding District Judges ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/25/22. (loh)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 First MOTION to Stay Discovery by Brad Raffensperger. Responses due by 4/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Brief in support of unopposed motion to stay all discovery related activity)(Willard, Russell)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Brad Raffensperger. Responses due by 4/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Brief in support of MTD)(Willard, Russell)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 First MOTION to Stay Discovery. (thb)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proof of Service and AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Brad Raffensperger, Secretary of State on 03/01/2022, filed by Brian D. Swanson. (jlh)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Brad Raffensperger answer due 3/22/2022. (jlh)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Ordered that the Court directs the Clerk to attach a copy of Rule 4 to this Order so that Plaintiff may determine the appropriate method of service for Defendant. The Court hereby notifies Plaintiff he must serve Defendant within ninety days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/8/22. (wwp)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Brad Raffensperger. (csr)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/8/2022. (csr)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brad Raffensperger, filed by Brian D. Swanson. $402.00 Filing Fee Paid; Receipt Number: AUG030324. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swanson v. Raffensperger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian D. Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Represented By: Russell David Willard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?