Anderson v. MetLife Group, Inc., et al
David Anderson |
MetLife Group, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
1:2022cv00026 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Crow, Nikole) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (thb) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, filed by David Anderson.(Johnson, Christopher) |
Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by David Anderson. (Johnson, Christopher) |
![]() |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/29/2022. (maa) |
Motions No Longer Referred: #11 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Notice of Removal, Original Complaint (cmr) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Notice of Removal, Original Complaint. (JH) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Notice of Removal,,, Original Complaint by David Anderson. Responses due by 4/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint)(Johnson, Christopher) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss (Partially) Plaintiff's Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Responses due by 4/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Brief in Support of Motion to Partially Dismiss)(Crow, Nikole) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party Defendant by MetLife Group, Inc.. Responses due by 4/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order (Consent Order))(Crow, Nikole) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party Defendant. (thb) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S ORDER granting #6 Motion for Clerk's Extension of Time (LR 6.1). Answer due by 3/25/2022. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/10/2022. (JH) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Clerk's Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by MetLife Group, Inc. Responses due by 3/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crow, Nikole) Modified on 3/10/2022 (JH). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Charles Johnson on behalf of David Anderson (Johnson, Christopher) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MetLife Group, Inc. identifying MetLife, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (Crow, Nikole) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Removal Notice To All Counsel of Record re: #1 Notice of Removal. (csr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MetLife Group, Inc. from the Superior Court of Richmond County, State of Georgia, case number 2022RCCV00038. (Filing fee paid on 3/4/2022 - $402.00; receipt number AGASDC-3297846). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Certificate of Insurance, MetLife Auto & Home Legal Services Plan Certificate of Coverage, MetLife Auto & Home Certificate Rider, #2 Exhibit B: Sheriff's Entry of Service, #3 Exhibit C: Service of Process Transmittal (CT Log), #4 Exhibit D: General Civil and Domestic Relations Case Filing Information Form (Superior Court Civil Sheet), #5 Exhibit E: Summons, #6 Exhibit F: Complaint, #7 Exhibit G: Plaintiff's First Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant, #8 Exhibit H: Standing Order for Mediation in Civil Cases, and Notice of Mediation Status. (Superior Court Standing Order), #9 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Notice of Appearance or Motion for Pro Hac Vice due by 3/14/2022. Re-file any pending motions previously filed due by 3/18/2022. (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.