Taylor v. Car Max Auto Finance / Auto Superstore et al
| James Lamont Taylor |
| Car Max Auto Finance / Auto Superstore, American Credit Acceptance, Exeter Finance Corporation, Westlake Financial Services and Capital One Auto Finance |
| 1:2022cv00094 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re Plaintiff's #5 Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/30/2022. (ca)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Lamont Taylor.(ca) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court orders Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/8/2022. (ca)
|
| Set Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/29/2022. (ca) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Forms.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by James Lamont Taylor. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by James Lamont Taylor. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/26/2022: #1 Corrected PDF) (JH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
